The Lancet
The preprint of the autopsy study that found the shots killed three quarters of the vaccinated suddenly-dead autopsied patients in the survey, posted on July 5th, was removed today, the 6th, from The Lancet preprint server under the dubious claim that “the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.”
Well, that may be true, and it probably isn’t.
But you know what conclusion isn’t supported by the methodology? The conclusion that the shots are safe. From the autopsy study by Hulscher and Alexander:
We found that no comprehensive review of autopsy findings in a large series of deaths after COVID19 vaccination that accounts for the current state of knowledge has been conducted. [Emphasis added]
No comprehensive review? There should have been daily, then weekly, then monthly reviews when the shot programs started. Globally. And I’ll reckon most of the sheeple thought there were those reviews. I remember talking to one that thought they knew the protocol and simply couldn’t be convinced there were no autopsies. “Any unexpected sudden death,” they told me, “is required to have an autopsy.”
Right after the shots rolled out the CDC assuaged everyone’s fears with assurances that autopsies confirmed there was no danger from the shots. That was 2021 they were telling those lies. Where are the autopsies?
Methods: We searched for all published autopsy and necropsy reports relating to COVID-19 vaccination up until May 18th, 2023. We initially identified 678 studies and, after screening for our inclusion criteria, included 44 papers that contained 325 autopsy cases and one necropsy case. [Emphasis added]
325 autopsies. After two and a half years. That methodology does not support the conclusion that the shots are safe. That methodology supports the conclusion the shots programs were intentionally left unattended and unmonitored.
And that conclusion — the empty assertion the shots were safe — was not merely printed in one preprint in The Lancet. It was printed across the pages of every major medical journal in the world.
When does negligence become manslaughter? Without these journals’ negligence the genocidal shot program could not have occurred. Whoever is calling the shots at these institutions cannot be trusted to hold such influential positions in society. They are criminals. They must be prosecuted. And at this point their crimes are: genocide and crimes against humanity.
So, let them dig their holes deeper.
tcro
1,000%